• Users Online: 69
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 33  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 311-315

Comparative study of intracameral lidocaine and topical mydriatics in pupil dilation during phacoemulsification


Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Kannur, Kerala, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. K K Shilpa Sunil
Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Pariyaram, Kannur - 670 503, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/kjo.kjo_74_21

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: Intracameral injection of preservative-free lidocaine is used as an alternative to reduce the potential disadvantages of common mydriatics in cataract surgery. Aims and Objectives: The aim is to evaluate pupil dilation by an intracameral injection of lidocaine during phacoemulsification cataract surgery and compare the results with those using conventional topical mydriatics. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 60 consecutive patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery under topical anesthesia at Government Medical College, Kannur from July 2018 to December 2019. Patients were allocated to intracameral lidocaine or topical mydriatics for dilation of the pupil before phacoemulsification. Results: The preoperative pupil size was similar in intracameral lidocaine (2.90 ± 0.3 mm) and topical mydriatic (2.81 ± 0.4 mm) groups. Pupil dilation was slightly more in the topical mydriatic group (7.31 ± 1.0 mm) compared to the intracameral lidocaine group (6.96 ± 1.0 mm). The pupil size at the end of the surgery was nearly similar in both groups. Mean duration of the surgery was similar in both the groups. Both the groups had 27 patients who maintained dilation till the end of the surgery. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant and a post hoc power analysis showed the need for studies with a larger sample size. Conclusion: This study shows that injection of 0.2–0.3 ml of preservative-free lidocaine 1% intracamerally provides persistent, stable, satisfactory pupil dilation comparable to that of topical mydriatics, for safe phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation. However, studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm that both interventions perform similarly.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed128    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded15    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal